gailsimone:

boobsanderson:

Sec 5.2(1)(c) of the ID screening regs of Aeronautics Act: “An air carrier shall not transport a passenger if the passenger does not appear to be of the gender indicated on the identification he or she presents.”

This can’t be legal, can it?

Or post-op people from countries that do not allow gender to be changed on passports.

(Source: underboobsanderson)

iandsharman:

I have met this man. Don’t hate me too much, ladies.

He’ll go on fire!

iandsharman:

I have met this man. Don’t hate me too much, ladies.

He’ll go on fire!

(Source: ghostdrone)

seancregan:

I’ve been terribly quiet recently (working and/or installing a shower), but here’s my two cents (which at 35% means only 0.7 cents of it are mine, but hey) on ebooks, value and pricing. Specifically as it applies to you and I, knocking our shit out for people to buy via Kindle and Nook and LCD…

(Source: iconomicon)

darraghdoyle:

10 Irish Inventions you may not be aware of 

darraghdoyle:

10 Irish Inventions you may not be aware of 

"I have no mercy or compassion in me for a society that will crush people, and then penalize them for not being able to stand up under the weight."

— Malcolm X  (via cuntbarf)

(Source: knowapower, via watermeloncholy)

neil-gaiman:

I think the most disturbing thing here is seeing what I’d look like in a rust-coloured shirt. Beautiful art. 

euclase:

A magpie with a Neil, drawn in PS, about 5 hours


Hair’s too neat :-)Face is wonderful.

neil-gaiman:

I think the most disturbing thing here is seeing what I’d look like in a rust-coloured shirt. Beautiful art. 

euclase:

A magpie with a Neil, drawn in PS, about 5 hours

Hair’s too neat :-)

Face is wonderful.

carnivaloftherandom:

glimglamoury:

demonweasel:

ladiesmakingcomics:

Dave Dorman is an artist whose work has been featured in Heavy Metal, the European adult comics magazine which frequently features erotic art and comics.

Here are samples of some of his covers:

Here’s the image he’s objecting to:

His excuse seems to be that he was under the impression, given something Brian K. Vaughan said in an interview about today’s comics being inaccessible to the younger generation, that Saga was meant to be an all-ages book.  However, that does not excuse the bulk of his reaction to the image of a mother breastfeeding her infant:

It seems that in today’s desperate-for-sales comic book market, nothing is sacred. In the midst of world-saving adventures, today’s modern heroine breast feeds her child with zero modesty…What a wholesome, family-friendly image!

I find this image offensive, not only for promotion of a comic book, but specifically for a comic that Brian clearly states that he would like to see today’s younger generation pick up and read as he did when he was kid. Rather than a family-friendly heroic saga, this promo art is telegraphing to the world that it’s a series I cannot share with my 7-year-old son.

Is the comics industry really so dead that they have to stretch to these desperate, shock value measures to incur readers? Really?

Jill Thompson immediately responded, “Breast feeding NOT offensive as Comicbook T&A.”  Saga artist Fiona Staples has responded with grace and confusion, ”I find it a little hard to fathom why anyone would object to a depiction of breastfeeding, even if it were on a kids’ comic, which it isn’t. I have yet to hear a line of reasoning that makes sense to me. That said, anyone who wants to be grossed out by our comic is of course free to do so.”

Meanwhile, I’m weaving back and forth between wanting to cry and wanting to punch Dorman in the face.

My sister recently had her first child.   Sometimes when I’m over at her house, the baby needs to eat.  Sometimes my sister can’t be bothered to take the baby elsewhere in the house, or sometime I’ll go with her to my niece’s room so we can keep talking, and my sister breastfeeds her daughter.  Every time it’s happened, my reaction to the scene has been one of awe, setting me on a contemplative path of how beautiful, powerful, and oddly efficient nature and life can be.  There is something so primal and natural about breastfeeding that is so easy to forget in today’s mechanized world.  Watching my niece suckle at my sister’s breast to me is like having a window into the past 100,000 years of hominid history, and for a brief moment makes me think that even with all the horrible things going on in the world today, ultimately we’ll be okay as a species, because most of us can be born, create more life, and sustain that life if we so choose.

In addition, there was some debate yesterday about whether the use of the word “ladyparts” is unforgivably cis-sexist.  I don’t have a real answer to that, but as a cis-woman, I do feel the need to feel empowered in my own body, and by how my body is tied to my identity as a woman, because on the whole, society does what it can to take that empowerment from me.

So to hear some cis-male T&A/BDSM artist call breastfeeding a “desperate, shock-value” image that he “can’t share with his 7-year-old son”, makes me want to cry and punch him in the face at the same time.

And this, ladies and gentlemen, is why we need more of a female perspective in comics.

Yeah, what the actual fuck Dorman…

C’mon, he just wants his kid to know that breasts are just funbags meant for sex!  If his seven year old saw a woman doing something with her breasts other than playing with them for a man’s pleasure, his kid would be irreparably damaged!  How indecent of that drawing, to depict a woman’s breast hidden behind a baby’s head and not barely covered by a metal pastie!  What is wrong with this world?

Fact: I seriously cannot take you seriously when you’re this much of a privileged ass. The commentary above is fabulous, though. 

When I heard about him being offended, I commented that there’s less skin showing than in many comics. I didn’t know who he was, and had no idea he did that sort of art. For covers! Somebody needs a bit of introspection.

jennthemusical:

the-white-prophet:

americangothgirl:

icoulduseinsouciantmaybe:

fuori-dal-mondo:

b-mommy:

talldarkbishoujo:

super-eklectic1:

nessfraserloves:

misswednesdayaddams:

skycry:

but you can see her arms
how immoral
she must have really low self esteem
why cant she just respect herself

Oh my god she’s so trashy.  Ladies don’t show their bare arms like that, seriously cover that shit up okay.

Uuuuggggh. This is why I hang out with gentlemen. It’s just so much easier to hang out with men rather than these trashy looking women showing the bodies to the world and having no self-respect.

hoes den lost their minds exposing their damn shoulders all willy nilly have some class you whores!!

STRUMPETS AND HARRIDANS, THE LOT OF THEM.

SCARLET WOMEN 

JEZEBELS

HARLOTS

NAUGHTY LADIES OF THE NIGHT

PINCHCOCK

TROLLOPS
HUSSIES
VILLAGE BIKES
TIMESHARES

jennthemusical:

the-white-prophet:

americangothgirl:

icoulduseinsouciantmaybe:

fuori-dal-mondo:

b-mommy:

talldarkbishoujo:

super-eklectic1:

nessfraserloves:

misswednesdayaddams:

skycry:

but you can see her arms

how immoral

she must have really low self esteem

why cant she just respect herself

Oh my god she’s so trashy.  Ladies don’t show their bare arms like that, seriously cover that shit up okay.

Uuuuggggh. This is why I hang out with gentlemen. It’s just so much easier to hang out with men rather than these trashy looking women showing the bodies to the world and having no self-respect.

hoes den lost their minds exposing their damn shoulders all willy nilly have some class you whores!!

STRUMPETS AND HARRIDANS, THE LOT OF THEM.

SCARLET WOMEN 

JEZEBELS

HARLOTS

NAUGHTY LADIES OF THE NIGHT

PINCHCOCK

TROLLOPS

HUSSIES

VILLAGE BIKES

TIMESHARES

(Source: theashkaari, via watermeloncholy)

Martin on his female characters

  • Facebook question for GRRM: What was your intent in providing such female characters of strength in a genre that typically reduces them to witches, wives, and whores?
  • George R. R. Martin: To be fair, I have my share of witches, wives, and whores. But I try to make them fully fleshed out human witches, wives, and whores. It all goes back to what I said earlier about common humanity. It seems strange that I have to say this, as a sort of weirdly radical statement, but women are people and they are driven by the same desires that drive men, I think. A desire for respect and power, a desire to protect your children. Greed for money, for acclaim, everyone wants to be loved. It is all common humanity. I just try to write my female characters as I write my males characters. I do take into account it is a very patriarchal society. They are limited to certain roles, some of them fit comfortably within the roles their Westerosi society assigned them. And some of them cannot fit comfortably into those roles, and therefore encounter a certain amount of rejection, or tension, or ridicule as they try to pursue their own dreams or as they frustrate their own dreams. All this is great, all this is conflict, it is character tension, it is what story is all about, the human heart in conflict with itself once again. One of the things that pleases me to no end is that I have so many female readers. They do write me, all the time, that they do like my female characters, and I am very pleased with it.